Report

The Redseer Brand Index

BPC Brands on Quick Commerce

JFM 2026 · Quarterly edition

This index details out the Beauty & Personal Care performance on quick commerce – the categories, price points and pack sizes it rewards, who's winning the shelf, and how brands are building durable positions on it.

India's Beauty & Personal Care market is racing from $26 Bn to $40 Bn in five years. Quick commerce will carry 1 in 10 of those BPC dollars by FY31, fast becoming the channel that decides who wins wallet share.

Live now Blinkit zepto Swiggy Instamart
Coming soon Traditional e-commerce Flipkart · Amazon · Nykaa & more
~$1 Bn
ARR of QC BPC (Jan–Mar 2026 GMV, annualized)
~90% YoY
Growth over JFM 2025
30 Mn+
Monthly BPC shoppers on QC

What this report is about

A quarterly read on where quick commerce is taking Beauty & Personal Care — the categories, price points and pack sizes it rewards, who's winning the shelf, and how brands are building durable positions on it.

Why it matters now

If you are a legacy brand: the shelf that took your predecessors decades to win in general trade is being re-auctioned in quarters. Your brand trust transfers to a 10-minute basket — but only if your packs, prices and availability are QC-right before challengers set the category codes.

If you are a digitally-native brand: quick commerce converts demand fastest once brand trust is well established in the category — build that first, then let QC harvest it. Learn from the category performance and best-in-class examples to get your products, pack sizes and price points QC-right early.

JFM 2026 · Quarterly edition
THE OPPORTUNITY · WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE, AND HOW TO WIN IT

The Opportunity and the Playbook to Win It

How the opportunity is shaping up in quick commerce and what it means for BPC brands.

2.1

QC share of BPC to double in the next ~5 years: 1 in 10 BPC purchases in India to happen on quick-commerce by 2031

India's BPC market compounds at 11–14% — but the mix shifts decisively online, and within online, to quick commerce.
Total BPC market
$26 → $41–48 Bn
India BPC market by 2031
FY26FY31
Online penetration
25% → 37–40%
Online share of total BPC
FY26FY31
QC share of online
18% → 27–31%
Quick commerce share of online BPC
FY26FY31
QC share of total
5% → 10–12%
Quick commerce share of all BPC
FY26FY31
GMV by channels for BPC — FY26 vs FY31
Offline BPCTraditional e-commerceQuick commerce
FY31 values and waterfall additions are shown as lower–upper ranges. Conversion: US$1 = ₹90
Already a billion-dollar shelfThe top-3 quick-commerce platforms are already at ~$1 Bn ARR in BPC (JFM-ARR basis), growing at ~90% YoY in FY26 — the fastest-compounding beauty shelf in India.
2.2

Impulse replenishment categories outperform on QC

Against a 21% overall online BPC benchmark, oral care leads at 33% while makeup trails at 14%. Urgent, replenishable categories move first
QC GMV as % of overall online GMV, by category · JFM26 (dotted line = 21% QC penetration of online BPC)

QC wins where the trigger is 'I just ran out, order now' — oral care leads penetration, while bath & body, skin care and fragrance are above the 21% benchmark. Hair care and makeup trail, reflecting more considered purchases and wider assortments that are harder to curate onto QC's finite shelf

Top 3 QC Players
2.3

Shampoo, moisturizer and sunscreen lead the way on both volume and premiumization

Mapping every sub-category on GMV scale vs average selling price separates the hero categories from the volume drivers, the premium opportunities and the long tail.
Sub-categories mapped: GMV scale vs ASP · JFM26
Conversion: US$1 = ₹90

Hero categories (high ASP × high GMV — sun care, face moisturiser, shampoo) reward full-price hero SKUs. Volume drivers (cleansers, oral, soap) win baskets at mass price points. Premium opportunity (perfumes, serums) proves shoppers pay ₹350–450 in ten minutes.

Top 3 QC Players
2.4

Small-mid sized packs win the 10-minute shelf

Pack architecture is an important determinant of who wins the 10-minute shelf. The same product sells in very different packs on QC than on the broader market.
QC BPC GMV by pack size · JFM26
Same product, two shelves — pack mix, overall vs QC
Overall eCommerceQuick Commerce
Top 3 QC Players
2.5

QC favors premium propositions: masstige + premium spends nearly double vs. the overall market

Splitting each category's spend into Mass, Masstige and Premium shows how far QC's mix tilts up-market against the overall (online + offline) market.
Share of category spend · overall (online+offline) vs quick commerce · JFM26
Overall (online + offline)Quick commerce

Masstige + premium spend is significantly higher on QC than the overall market (59% vs. 37%) — a pattern that holds across every category. QC's advantage for premium brands is solving a core distribution gap: access to premium labels in 10 minutes

Top 3 QC Players
2.6

A consolidated shelf, but open to new brands. Top 10 = 25%, next 65 = 50%

Ten brands take a quarter of the shelf; the next sixty-five take half; a tail of 1,500+ brands fights for the remaining quarter.
% GMV by Brands — JFM26

Rank is disproportionately valuable on the QC shelf — but there's real potential for smaller brands to climb, starting narrow: win a sub-category first, then use that position to move up the overall ranking

Top 3 QC Players
2.7

Legacy brands have an edge on QC, given their decades of trust; DNBs earn theirs first, then convert through QC

DNBs hold just 17% of overall BPC, but 37% of quick commerce and 47% of traditional e-commerce.
% share of GMV by channel — Legacy vs DNB brands — JFM26
Digitally-native brands (DNB)Legacy brands

Legacy leans slightly harder on QC (63% vs 53% on e-commerce), likely reflecting QC's low-consideration basket. QC converts trust for every brand — legacy brings decades of it in at zero cost; DNBs have to build that trust elsewhere first (social media, D2C, traditional e-commerce), then bring it here to close

Top 3 QC Players
2.8

Winning brands ride on breakout SKUs: 7 of the top 10 have at least one

A single hero SKU crossing ₹20 Cr in annualized GMV is the signature of a top-ranked brand — and it thins out fast down the ranking.
Share of brands on QC with at least one SKU > ₹20 Cr annualized GMV, by rank bucket · JFM26
JFM 2026 · Quarterly edition
QC brand battlefield · JFM 2026

QC BPC Leaderboard: Top brands on the quick-commerce shelf

Ranked by JFM 2026 GMV across Blinkit, Zepto and Swiggy Instamart · 1,500+ brands measured · top 75 = ~75% of the shelf

BlinkitZeptoSwiggy InstamartDNBLegacyClick a parent row to see its brand split
Conversion: US$1 = ₹90
JFM 2026 · Quarterly edition
How to win - Case Studies

Two routes to the same shelf:
earn it new, or defend it well

Quick commerce rewards different approaches depending on where you start. Digitally-native brands must earn trust before QC will convert it. Legacy brands already have trust — their advantage is won or lost on execution and innovation speed.

Case 01 · Leading DNB in body lotions
₹150 Cr
body-lotion GMV in 2 years
#5
in body lotions on QC
D2C-first
channel sequence

The D2C-first route: know the customer well before you rent the shelf

01 · Build

Invested in a strong D2C channel — own website and mobile app first.

02 · Validate

1P customer data validated PMF and cracked the hero product.

03 · Scale

₹150 Cr body-lotion revenue in 2 years through a D2C-first approach (FY26).

04 · Harvest

Scaling fast on QC — #5 in body lotions, a space dominated by legacy giants.

"D2C was the laboratory. First-party data de-risked the hero SKU, so the brand arrived on quick commerce with proof."
Case 02 · Leading DNB in sunscreen & broader skin care
₹800 Cr+
GMV in ~7 years
#3
in overall skincare on QC

The social + marketplace route: make the product famous, then make it instant

01 · Fame

GenZ-first Influencer Marketing — making sunscreen a daily skin care habit.

02 · Trial

Quirky, distinctive packaging became the trial hook.

03 · Scale

₹800 Cr+ GMV in ~7 years, largely on marketplaces.

04 · Harvest

Scaling fast on QC — #3 in overall skincare.

"Social media creates the want; quick commerce closes it — both the first impulse buy, and every reorder after."

Neither brand used QC to find customers — both used it to serve customers they had already won. On a low-consideration, rank-driven shelf, demand built off-platform is the moat.

About us

Redseer Strategy Consultants
Guiding critical decisions in disruptive markets

Leading consumer growth advisors. For 17+ years, Redseer has been the growth advisor behind India's consumer internet and consumer brands story — finding the whitespace, decoding what it takes to win it, and turning that into decisions leadership teams can act on. This report is one example: a live, quarterly read on a shift most of the market hasn't fully priced in yet.

17+
years advising consumer & internet leaders
1,000+
consultants across 22 offices worldwide (through OC&C partnership)
500+
CXO-level mandates delivered to India's largest and fast-emerging consumer & internet companies
5,000+
brands, tracked monthly, the largest continuous online brand-performance panel in India

What we do

Three practices, one promise: decisions grounded in primary, granular market reality — not survey averages.

1

Strategic advisory to CXOs on growth

Decade-plus experience helping consumer brand leaders make the right strategic calls, and execute them: which channels to prioritize, how to adapt the product portfolio, margin structure & promotional choices to win on them, and where to expand next. Leader in consumer-focused strategy · #1 in digital-ecosystem advisory.

2

Transaction advisory

M&A, fundraising and exit advisory for consumer brands, alongside buy-side diligence for their investors (PE/VC). Leader in private-transactions advisory · #1 on IPO strategy in the region · deep track record in consumer, beauty, personal care and D2C transactions over the last decade.

3

Market insights — Benchmarks (benchmarks.digital)

Pioneers in tracking market and player performance & opportunity analysis (GMV, users, orders, operational metrics and unit economics) in India's internet sectors each month. Best-in-class IP and research on 150+ marketplaces / platforms and 5,000+ brands with a tech-led + human-led research approach — the platform this Index is built on.

How we partner with consumer brands

We drive growth across five core dimensions — from sizing the opportunity to closing inorganic deals.

1Growth Acceleration
  • Opportunity sizing & landscape — TAM/SAM by segment, price point and sub-category; demand forecasting; competitive intensity; customer viewpoint.
  • Growth roadmap design — company strengths, competitive edge, customer NPS and whitespace mapping, translated into a 3-year actionable plan.
2Digital Excellence
  • Channel-mix strategy — e-commerce, q-commerce, FSA, eB2B, D2C and social — sequencing, investment levels and a platform-by-platform playbook.
  • Terms-of-trade optimization — data-driven negotiation playbooks with key channel partners, anchored in competitive benchmarks and unit economics.
3Market & Category Expansion
  • Geographic expansion — international entry and domestic city / micro-market deepening, sequenced by demand pockets and unit economics.
  • New & adjacent category entry — attractiveness assessment, build-vs-buy decisioning and go-to-market design.
4Customer Value Maximization
  • Customer archetyping & targeting — persona identification, prioritization and proposition refinement for highest-value segments.
  • Retention & wallet-share lift — NPS diagnostics, churn-driver analysis, loyalty design and cross-sell levers.
5Inorganic Growth
  • Target identification & shortlisting — strategic-fit screen, synergy mapping and proprietary deal sourcing across the consumer ecosystem.
  • Commercial & strategic due diligence — market-thesis validation, customer & competitive deep-dives and a value-creation roadmap for buy-side / sell-side.
The Index · Reference

Coverage — what the Index measures

The Index measures Beauty & Personal Care as consumers shop it — grooming, makeup, fragrance and oral care are in; adjacent hygiene, appliances and wellness categories are out, so brand shares are compared on a like-for-like shelf.

Inclusions and exclusions

#CategoryDefinitionsIncluded / excluded
1GroomingAll male and female grooming products
Hair careShampoo, conditioners, hair oil, serums, hair masks, sprays, hair colours, etc.
Face careFace wash, face scrub, cleansers, serums, moisturizers, toner, sheet masks, lip balms, sunscreens, eye cream, etc.
Body careBody lotions, soaps, showergels, body scrub, foot creams, hand care, etc.
Men groomingShaving cream, aftershave, beard care, cartridges & razors, roll-ons, deos, etc.
Female groomingCotton buds & balls, manicure & pedicure kits, loofahs & scrubbers, deos, etc.
2MakeupFace, eye, body, lip, nail makeup, makeup remover
3FragrancePerfumes, attar, colognes
4Oral careToothbrushes, floss, toothpaste, rinsers, sprays, tongue cleaners, etc.
5Sanitary careSanitizing wipes, hand sanitizer, sanitization kits, surface spray
6Beauty appliancesStraightener, trimmer, curlers, steamers, facial steamers, etc.
7Hygiene and wellnessSanitary pads, feminine wipes, sexual wellness, etc.
8Nutraceuticals (vitamins, etc.)Vitamin tablets, supplements, herbal products, etc.
The Index · Reference

Definitions — the terms behind the numbers

Nine definitions govern every chart in this Index. When in doubt, this page wins.

1 · DNB — Digitally-native brandsBrands born in 2011 or later and doing more than 50% of their revenue from online channels.
2 · LegacyAll traditional brands born before 2011.
3 · GMVGross Merchandise Value at selling price (post MRP discount but before any checkout or coupon discounts), including cancellations and returns. Excludes delivery fees or any additional charges.
4 · ASPAverage selling price of the product post MRP discount.
5 · $ conversionUS dollar figures converted at ₹90 per USD.
6 · Horizontals / Verticals / Brand.comHorizontals — players like Flipkart, Amazon, Meesho. Verticals — players like Nykaa, Myntra, Purplle. Brand.com — sales through a brand's own website / apps.
7 · Traditional e-commerceHorizontals + verticals + brand.com.
8 · Quick commerceIncludes the top-7 quick-commerce players unless otherwise specified — Blinkit, Zepto, Swiggy Instamart, Amazon Now, Flipkart Minutes, BB Now, JioMart Quick.
9 · Price tiers — Mass / Masstige / PremiumPrice tiers—Mass, Masstige, and Premium—are defined based on the price per ml/g within each product category. For example, in the body lotion category:

Mass — Affordable body lotions priced below ₹1.5 per ml, targeting a broad consumer base.

Masstige — Mid-range body lotions priced between ₹1.5 and ₹6 per ml, offering a balance of affordability and premium appeal.

Premium — High-end body lotions priced above ₹6 per ml, featuring premium ingredients, elevated formulations, and prestige branding.
The Index

Disclaimer & terms of use

This Index is an independent Redseer assessment, provided for general information only. Please read the terms below before using or citing any figure from it.

1. Scope of this assessment

This Index has been prepared by Redseer Strategy Consultants (“Redseer”) as an independent assessment of the Beauty & Personal Care market across Swiggy Instamart, Zepto and Blinkit.

2. Research limitations

The information provided in the Index is subject to limitations, including, among others, the nature of the underlying data and statistical analysis, the structured and unstructured research datasets used, and publicly available information. Accordingly, the findings do not purport to be exhaustive.

While we have taken due care and caution in preparing the deliverables based on the research available to us, we do not guarantee or warrant the accuracy, completeness, merchantability or reliability of the information. The underlying assumptions are further subject to limitations such as the interpretation of market scenarios across sources, data availability, and similar factors. You acknowledge that no information provided by Redseer is audited or independently verified.

3. Third-party trademarks

All third-party names, logos, product and service names, designs and slogans (collectively, “Third-Party Trademarks”) contained in this document are the property of their respective owners. Third-Party Trademarks are used only to refer to the owners of the Third-Party Trademarks in question, and such use does not constitute or imply any relationship between Redseer and those owners, including any affiliation, sponsorship, endorsement or approval of products and/or services, unless otherwise expressly indicated.

4. No recommendations

The Index is provided on an “as-is” basis for general information only and is not intended to provide advice or make recommendations regarding any specific subject matter. Any commercial, business or other decisions based on this Index or on the information provided by Redseer are the sole responsibility and liability of the entity or person making such decisions, and Redseer shall not be liable in any manner whatsoever. Redseer, its affiliates and associated parties shall not be liable for any actions — including any business or commercial decisions — taken by the recipient on the basis of this document.

5. Limitation of liability

In no event shall Redseer or its partners, directors, employees, consultants or agents be liable to any third party for any decision made, action taken or omission made in reliance on the information provided in this document, or for any errors, inaccuracies or omissions in it, or for merchantability or fitness for purpose. This includes any losses, injuries or damages — whether incidental, consequential, special, punitive, economic or similar, including loss of goodwill, loss of business or loss of profits arising out of or in connection with the use of any information in this document.

6. Right to modify

Redseer reserves the right to modify any data or deliverable in subsequent periods without attributing a reason, and is not obligated to correct previously provided information as new information becomes available.

Copyright © Redseer Strategy Consultants Private Limited (“Redseer”). All rights reserved.

The Redseer Brand Index | Redseer Strategy Consultants